Skip to main content

Topics

Like its predecessor, the Federal Commission for Evaluating Noise Emission Limits, the Federal Noise Abatement Commission (FNAC) deals with the following issues.

Precautionary principle

The intention of the precautionary principle is both to limit noise emissions at source and to prevent future problems caused by the construction of buildings with rooms sensitive to noise in areas susceptible to noise pollution.

Impact of noise and vibration pollution on the health and well-being of the population

Under the Environmental Protection Act (USG), emission limits generally have to be set for evaluation of the harmful effects or nuisance. They must be defined so that emissions below these levels do not significantly affect the well-being of the population. The pollution limits in the Noise Abatement Ordinance (LSV) were defined on the basis of these criteria.

Evaluation method and exposure limits for noise and vibration

The exposure-response relationship between the noise to which people are exposed and the resulting health effects is determined through large-scale surveys of the population or epidemiological studies. The results of such studies serve as the basis for the Commission to set exposure limit values. The FNAC periodically reviews whether there are grounds for revising the assessment methods and exposure limit values for noise. The most recent review of the exposure limit values for road, rail and aircraft noise is set out in the EKLB’s latest report (available in german, french, or italian).

Repercussions of noise pollution on spatial and settlement development

The Environmental Protection Act (USG) and the Noise Abatement Ordinance (LSV) contain regulations on the locations and levels applicable to pollution limits and the measures to be introduced if they are exceeded. In addition to being extremely costly for the national economy, noise pollution has serious repercussions for spatial and settlement development. Excessive noise pollution in a region can result in significant financial losses and restrict settlement development in the municipality affected. Cantonal and regional development plans can be curtailed or become impossible.

External noise pollution costs

External costs are not paid by the actual polluters. The various effects of noise pollution appear in many different external costs. The latter are essentially rental losses and reduced property prices, health costs, production losses, noise abatement costs, spatial planning costs, etc.

Aids to implementation

To ensure uniform implementation of the environmental law on noise, the commission develops aids on matters which are not yet regulated or which could be subject to different interpretations.